JuridischForum.be

Deontologische code
This code of ethics is binding on every member of the European Family Therapy
Association (EFTA) and should be read in conjunction with the code of ethics of the relevant professional body(s). It is applicable to the relationships of its members with respect to their clients, their students and supervisees, and their colleagues. It also covers the responsibilities of EFTA members with regard to the demands and requirements of their profession. The ethical standards for Family Therapists require a personal commitment and lifelong effort to act ethically.
In choosing to join, and to remain a member of EFTA, each member agrees to conduct
his or her work according to the EFTA code of ethics currently in operation, and to
accept any decision made by EFTA in accordance with this code.


1. Responsibility to clients
(1)
The therapist is putting his or her competence and knowledge at the service of their
clients.
Therapists must be aware of the influential nature of their relationship with their clients,
and must avoid exploiting the trust of their clients for their own personal gain.
The therapeutic relationship is confidential, whether it involves an individual, a couple
or a family. Therapists must commit themselves to respecting the confidentiality of their
clients.
In case of harm, or risk of harm to self or others, confidentiality must be subjugated to
the duty of care according to the laws and practices of each country.
Therapists are required to take full account of the possible effects of their own physical
and mental health on their capacity to provide an ethical professional service.
All research carried out which involves clients must be done in careful consideration of
the ethical implication for all parties, and should be subjected to outside scrutiny, where
possible through local ethical committees.

2. Responsibility to Students.
Supervisors should be aware of the fact that they may hold considerable authority over
their students and supervisees, and must respect the supervisory relationship. The
supervisees’ trust and confidentiality must not be exploited by the supervisor in any
way.

3. Responsibility to Colleagues
Therapists should attempt to collaborate fruitfully and effectively with their colleagues,
particularly as regards the welfare of their clients and trainees.
Page 2
Therapists must acknowledge the contribution of colleagues to their own research and
ideas by the appropriate credits and citations.

4. Professional Responsibilities
Therapists try to maximise benefits and minimise harm. Cases which fall outside their
domain of competence should be referred to the relevant professionals.
Therapists should strive to remain up to date with the latest developments in family
therapy research and practice, and engage in educational activities when possible.

5. Violations of the Code of Ethics
In cases in which a member, whether a person or an institute, has been found by a
responsible body such as their national family therapy organisation, their professional
body, or a court, to have committed a serious ethical violation the ethical committee
may propose to have their membership of EFTA withdrawn.
The board of the European Family Therapy Association will create two committees
responsible for applying this code of ethics. One will deal with cases of suspected
violation of the code of ethics, while the other will rule in cases of appeal.


(1)
Clients is referred to as including individuals, couples, families, teams, agencies, and
any consultation group.
.
Dank u wel

H

Zelfde posting in februari.
Wat is de bedoeling???
Wat zegt uw advocaat ... desnoods maar daarvoor weten we niet wie inzage heeft gehad klacht met burgerlijke partijstelling wegens laster en eerroof.
Echter indien dokument enkel werd voorgelegd ter zitting door uw ex echtgenote stel ik me vragen ...

Misschien moeten we beginnen met een onderscheid in terminologie te maken.

Psychotherapeut is een niet erkend en niet beschermd beroep. Ik mag morgen een bordje met die titel aan mijn deur hangen en wachten op klanten, volledig legaal.
Psycholoog is wel een erkend beroep.
Er zijn therapeuten die ook psycholoog zijn, maar de meesten zijn het niet. De meeste therapeuten zullen wel 'een bepaalde' opleiding gevolgd hebben, maar zelfs dat is niet verplicht.

‘Psychotherapeuten zijn hulpverleners die een gespecialiseerde psychotherapieopleiding hebben gevolgd. In Nederland is de titel psychotherapeut beschermd en mag alleen gevoerd worden indien men door de overheid als zodanig erkend wordt...In België is de titel nog niet beschermd.’(http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychother ... herapeuten" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;).

“Art.444.De schuldige wordt gestraft met gevangenisstraf van acht dagen tot een jaar en met geldboete van zesentwintig euro tot tweehonderd euro, wanneer de tenlasteleggingen geschieden :...Hetzij ten slotte door geschriften, die niet openbaar gemaakt, maar aan verscheidene personen toegestuurd of meegedeeld worden.”(Sw.=Strafwetboek 8 juni 1867).

Ik ga ervan uit dat niet de psychotherapeute haar verslag aan verscheidene personen toegestuurd of meegedeeld heeft,zodat ze dus ook het misdrijf uit art.444 Sw. niet pleegde.

‘Tevens heeft mijn ex G het verslag gebruikt van Mevr. L als bewijslast tegen mij’ kan wel een schending zijn van art.444 Sw.

ECHTER: “Art.452.Vóór de rechtbank gesproken woorden of aan de rechtbank overlegde geschriften, geven geen aanleiding tot strafvervolging wanneer die woorden of die geschriften op de zaak of op de partijen betrekking hebben...”(Sw.).

Mja, de TS heeft de oorspronkelijke vraag volledig gewist en er deze in de plaats gezet....